COURSE UNIT TITLE

: USING WEB 2.0 AND WEB 3.0 TOOLS IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
FMK 5031 USING WEB 2.0 AND WEB 3.0 TOOLS IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION ELECTIVE 3 0 0 8

Offered By

Chemistry Teacher Education

Level of Course Unit

Second Cycle Programmes (Master's Degree)

Course Coordinator

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR GÜLTEN ŞENDUR

Offered to

Chemistry Teacher Education

Course Objective

The main objective of this course is to inform students about web 2.0 and web 3.0 tools and to examine their applications in chemistry teaching.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   1. Explain the importance of Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 tools in education,
2   2. To be able to explain the types of Web 2.0 tools,
3   3. To be able to explain the types of Web 3.0 tools,
4   4. To be able to prepare a lesson plan that includes Web 2.0 tools in chemistry education.
5   5. To be able to prepare a lesson plan that includes Web 3.0 tools in chemistry education.

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 1. Week:Definitions related to Web 2.0 tools
2 2.Week: Concept map and drawing tools from Web 2.0 tools
3 3. Week: Animation and video tools from Web 2.0 tools
4 4. Week: Word Clouds Tools from Web 2.0 tools
5 5. Week: Interactive presentation tools from Web 2.0 tools
6 6.Week: Online storage and file sharing tools from Web 2.0 tools
7 7. Week: Definitions related to Web 3.0 tools
8 8.Week: Infographic preparation and tools
9 9. Week: Examples from national and international studies on using Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 tools in chemistry education
10 10. Week: Examples from national and international studies on using Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 tools in chemistry education
11 11.Week:Examples from national and international studies on using Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 tools in chemistry education
12 12. Week: Homework presentations
13 13. Week: Homework presentations
14 14. Week: Homework presentations
15 15.Week:General evaluation

Recomended or Required Reading

Tatlı, Z. (2017). Kavram Öğretiminde Web 2.0 araçları. Pegem Yayıncılık : Ankara
Işbulan, O; Kaynak, Z.D. ve Kıyıcı , M. (2019). 101 Araçla Web 2.0, Pegem Yayıncılık : Ankara
Carmichael, P., & Jordan, K. (2012). Semantic web technologies for education time for a `turn to practice . Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(2), 153-169.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

Doing research, project preparation, discussion, making presentation.

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 ASG ASSIGNMENT
2 PRS PRESENTATION
3 FCG FINAL COURSE GRADE ASG * 0.50 + PRS * 0.50


*** Resit Exam is Not Administered in Institutions Where Resit is not Applicable.

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

Evaluation of homework and presentation materials.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

To be announced.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

gulten.sendur @deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

Friday between 14.00-15.00

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 10 3 30
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 10 10 100
Preparing assignments 1 30 30
Preparing presentations 1 30 30
Project Assignment 1 3 3
Project Final Presentation 1 3 3
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 196

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14PO.15
LO.1554
LO.2554
LO.3554
LO.45554555
LO.55554555