COURSE UNIT TITLE

: HISTORY AND THEORY OF ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
MIM 3536 HISTORY AND THEORY OF ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING ELECTIVE 2 0 0 3

Offered By

Architecture

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DENIZ LÖKÇE

Offered to

Architecture

Course Objective

The course examines the shifting techniques of architectural drawing from antiquity until today. It discusses the position of the architect, the changing role of drawing, design methods, representation techniques, and the effects of drawing techniques on architecture in different eras. On completion of this course, the student will be able to be familiar with the literature on the topic and understand that architectural drawing is not only a technical phenomenon, but also a cultural issue. The course mainly focuses on the architectural productions of the Western culture.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   To grasp the revolutionary changes of architectural drawing techniques from antiquity until today
2   To evaluate the effects of drawing techniques on architecture
3   To understand that architectural drawing is not only a technical but also a cultural phenomenon
4   To interpret the role of drawing, the position of the architect, design methods, and representation techniques in different eras
5   To comparatively discuss turning points such as the invention of perspective, the discovery of darkness, the use of section and axonometry in architecture, and the dynamic relationship of subject and object

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Introduction to the history and theory of architectural drawing
2 Architectural drawing and sketch
3 Shadow, darkness, and the invention of drawing
4 Orthographic set
5 Perspective projection
6 Parallel projection
7 Mid-term
8 Eccentric perspective: Anamorphosis
9 Illusionary perspective: Trompe l'oeil
10 Map ve cartography
11 Collage and montage
12 Student presentations
13 Student presentations
14 General review and discussion
15 Final jury week

Recomended or Required Reading

Alberti, Leon Battista (2015), Resim Üzerine ve Heykel Üzerine, Istanbul: Janus.
Allmer, Açalya (2006), Mimari Yaratıda Amaç ve Araç Sorunu Üzerine Bir Deneme, Yapı, No. 299, ss. 45-48.
Altınyıldız Artun, Nur (2012), Mimarlık Nesnesi ve Başka Nesneler, Arzu Mimarlığı, Istanbul: Iletişim, ss. 119-153.
Bal, Bilge (2012), Düşsel Atlaslar: Constant'ın Yeni Babil'i ve Calvino'nun Görünmez Kentler'i ile Zaman Ötesi Yolculuklar, Arzu Mimarlığı: Mimarlığı Düşünmek ve Düşlemek, ed. Nur Altınyıldız Artun, Roysi Ojalvo, Istanbul: Iletişim, ss. 207-255.
Balık, Deniz (2016), Mimarlar Neden Hala Çiziyor : 21. Yüzyılda El Çizimi Üzerine Notlar, XXI, No. 155, ss. 30-34.
Belardi, Paolo (2015), Mimarlar Neden Hala Çiziyor Istanbul: Janus.
Belardi, Paolo (2018), Ölçmek, Çizmek, Bilmek, Istanbul: Janus.
Belting, Hans (2012), Floransa ve Bağdat: Doğu'da ve Batı'da Bakışın Tarihi, Istanbul: Koç Üniversitesi.
Da Vinci, Leonardo (1478), Codex Atlanticus, erişim linki: http://codex-atlanticus.it/#/
Damisch, Hubert (2012), Bulut Kuramı: Resim Tarihi Için Bir Katkı, Istanbul: Metis.
Doğru, Refiye Funda, (2015), Mimari Temsil Yaklaşımı Olarak Deneyimsel Montaj, yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
Ek, Fatma Ipek (2012), 18. Yüzyılda Bozulan Ezber: Piranesi, Skop, No. 2.
Florenski, Pavel (2007), Tersten Perspektif, Istanbul: Metis.
Garfield, Simon (2020), Harita Üzerinde: Kaşifler, Dahi Haritacılar ve Hiç Var Olmamış Dağlar, Istanbul: Domingo.
Gombrich, Ernst H. (2015), Sanat ve Yanılsama, Istanbul: Remzi.
Gombrich, Ernst H. (2020), Gölgeler: Düşen Gölgenin Batı Sanatında Tasviri, Istanbul: Everest.
Gürer, Tan Kamil ve Atilla Yücel, (2005), Bir Paradigma Olarak Mimari Temsilin Incelenmesi, Itü a/z, Cilt 4, No. 1, ss. 84-96.
Hemiş, Özlem (2020), Gözün Menzili: Islami Coğrafyada Bakışın Serüveni, Istanbul: Vakıfbank.
Lacan, Jacques (2013), Anamorfoz, Çizgi ve Işık, Psikanalizin Dört Temel Kavramı, Istanbul: Metis, ss. 87-101.
Maden, Feray ve Deniz Şengel, (2009), Kırılan Temsiliyet: Libeskind'de Bellek, Tarih ve Mimarlık, METU JFA, No. 26, ss. 49-70.
Öztürk, Evren (2018), Odaklan/Patlat/Süperpoze Et: Erken Tasarım Sürecinin Eleştirel Yeniden Ele Alınışı, XXI, No. 16.
Panofsky, Erwin (2013), Perspektif: Simgesel Bir Biçim, Istanbul: Metis.
Pickles, John (2011), Uzamların Tarihi: Haritacılık Mantığı, Haritalandırma ve Coğrafi Olarak Kodlanmış Dünya, Istanbul: Yapı Kredi.
Stoichita, Victor I. (2006), Gölgenin Kısa Tarihi, Ankara: Dost.
Şerbetçi, Muzaffer (1996), Haritacılık Bilimi Tarihi, Harita Dergisi, No. 15.
Tan, Funda (2013), Çizim Mimarlığı: Mimari Bir Motivasyon Olarak Çizim, yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
Tanyeli, Uğur (2002), Mimarlıkta Temsiliyet, Arredamento Mimarlık, No. 146, s. 76.
Tanyeli, Uğur (2000), Simülasyon Çağında Mimarlık ve Woods, Çağdaş Dünya Mimarları 4, Istanbul: Boyut.
TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi (2019), Ilişkisel Bir Eylem Olarak Haritalama, Dosya 42.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

Lecture, video screening, student presentation, discussion.

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1
2
3
4
5
6


*** Resit Exam is Not Administered in Institutions Where Resit is not Applicable.

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

1. During online education format, mid-term and final exam may be given as homework/assignment.
2. In written assignments, students are obliged to give credit for all sentences that they cite. Plagiarism is not allowed.
3. If they need to refer to online sources, they are not allowed to use blogs and anonymous websites; they can only use official web sites and scholarly e-journals as references.

Assessment Criteria

Midterm exam % 30 (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5)
Presentation % 30 (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5)
Final exam % 40 (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5)

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

1. It is highly recommended to have attended the courses MIM 3732 Rönesans Mimarisi ve Etkileri and MIM 3811 Modern Mimarlık Tarihi.
2. It is not considered as a valid excuse to be absent in class for late submissions of assignments.
3. Late submissions will be subject to a different evaluation.
4. All kinds of plagiarism will result in a disciplinary action.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

deniz.balik@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

Will be announced.

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 11 2 22
Student Presentations 2 2 4
Preparing presentations 1 20 20
Preparation for midterm exam 1 10 10
Preparation for final exam 1 15 15
Midterm 1 2 2
Final 1 2 2
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 75

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14PO.15
LO.1555
LO.255
LO.3555
LO.455
LO.5555