COURSE UNIT TITLE

: IMPLICATIONS OF ARGUMENTATION IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
FMK 5036 IMPLICATIONS OF ARGUMENTATION IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION ELECTIVE 3 0 0 8

Offered By

Chemistry Teacher Education

Level of Course Unit

Second Cycle Programmes (Master's Degree)

Course Coordinator

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AYBÜKE PABUÇCU AKIŞ

Offered to

Chemistry Teacher Education

Course Objective

The objective of this course is to inform students about using argumentation in chemistry education and to provide them some example guidelines for structuring the lessons in ways that would support evidence-based reasoning to take place.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   create necessary environment to promote students argumentation in chemistry classes
2   evaluate argumentation activities,
3   evaluate the quality of verbal and written argumentations
4   evaluate the argumentation as an epistemic practice of science

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 1 Epistemic practices of science
2 2 Cognitive Foundations of Learning Argumentation
3 3 Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms
4 4 Social Aspects of Argumentation
5 5 The Use of Argumentation in Socio-Scientific Issues
6 6 The Use of Argumentation in Science Education
7 7 The Use of Argumentation in Chemistry Education
8 8 Designing Argumentation Learning Environments
9 9 Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments to Support Students' Argumentation
10 10 Assessing the Quality of Argumentation
11 11 Enhancing the quality of argument in school science
12 12 Argument- Based Inquiry Classrooms
13 13 Homework presentations
14 14 Homework presentations
15 15 General evaluation

Recomended or Required Reading

Textbook(s)/References/Materials:
- Aydeniz, M., Pabuccu, A., Cetin, P. S., & Kaya, E. (2012). Argumentation and students conceptual understanding of properties and behaviors of gases, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6),1303-1324. Doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1.
- Erduran, S., & Jimenez Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.) (2007). Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer. Erduran, S. & Pabuccu, A. (2012).
- Bonding Chemistry and Argument: Teaching and Learning Argumentation through Chemistry Stories. University of Bristol, UK http://www.bristol.ac.uk/education/news/2012/63.html
- Erduran, S. & Pabuccu, A. (2015). Promoting argumentation in the context of chemistry stories, Book Chapter in Relevant Chemistry Education- From Theory to Practice, Ingo Eilks and Avi Hofstein (eds.), ISBN Hardcover: 9789463001748, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, p. 143-161.
- Erduran, S., Simon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915 933.
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M., Rodríguez, A. & Duschl, R. (2000). Doing the lesson or doing science : Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 81(11), 533 559.
- Pabuccu, A. & Erduran, S. (2016). Investigating students engagement in epistemic and narrative practices of chemistry in the context of a story on gas behavior, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 523-531. Doi:10.1039/C6RP00011H.
- Pabuccu, A. & Erduran, S. (2017). Beyond rote learning in organic chemistry: The infusion and impact of argumentation in tertiary education, International Journal of Science Education, 39(9), 1154-1172. Doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1319988.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

Doing research, project preparation, discussion, making presentation.

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 ASG ASSIGNMENT
2 PRS PRESENTATION
3 FCG FINAL COURSE GRADE ASG * 0.50 + PRS * 0.50


*** Resit Exam is Not Administered in Institutions Where Resit is not Applicable.

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

Evaluation of homeworks, argumentations and presentation materials.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

Attendance to the course is important

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

aybuke.pabuccuakis@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

Friday between 14.00-15.00

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 10 3 30
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 10 10 100
Preparing assignments 1 30 30
Preparing presentations 1 30 30
Project Assignment 1 3 3
Project Final Presentation 1 3 3
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 196

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14PO.15
LO.155554
LO.255555
LO.35555554
LO.4554555