COURSE UNIT TITLE

Offered By

Architecture

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR DOCTOR DENIZ GÜNER

Offered to

Architecture

Course Objective

ARC 4503 Architectural Design V project has the following objectives:
* To understand and present a design problem within the framework of upper-scale urban relations,
* Managing on their own by including interdisciplinary studies in the process,
* It aims to enable students to transform a mixed-program into spatial organizations and structural designs.

The project proposals expected to be developed at this level aim to interpret "publicity", one of the most important concepts discussed in this course, and to cope with multiple problems such as different users, mixed-functions and upper-scale urban decisions.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

MIM 3504 - ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO IV

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Recomended or Required Reading

ESSENTIAL READINGS
* Rem Koolhaas; Bruce Mau, S, M, L, XL: Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large, The Monacelli Press, 1995.
* Rem Koolhaas, Francine Fort, Stefano Boeri, Sanford Kwinter, Daniela Fabricius, Nadia Tazi, Hans Ulrich Obrist, Mutations, ACTAR, 2000.
* Rem Koolhaas, Öğrencilerle Söyleşiler: Rem Koolhaas, Çev.: Nazım Dikbaş, YEM Yayın, 2014.
* Rem Koolhaas, Conversations with Students (Architecture at Rice), Princeton Architectural Press, 1996.
* Bernard Chang, Jeffrey Inaba, Rem Koolhaas, Sze Tsung Leong, Great Leap Forward / Harvard Design School Project on the City, Taschen, 2002.
* Rem Koolhaas; Hal Foster, Junkspace with Running Room, New York Review of Books, 2016.
* Kenneth Frampton, Megaform as Urban Landscape; Raoul Wallenberg Lecture, The University of Michigan, 1999.
* Junzo Kuroda, Momoyo Kaijima, Made in Tokyo: Guide Book, Kajima Institute Publishing Co., 2001.
* Robert Venturi, Steven Izenour, Denise Scott Brown, Learning from Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of Architectural Form [Revised Edition], The MIT Press, 1977.
* Robert Venturi, Las Vegas'ın Öğrettikleri: Mimari Biçimin Unutulan Simgeselliği, Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı, 1993.
* Robert Venturi, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture [2nd ed.], Harry N. Abrams, 2002.
* Robert Venturi, Mimarlıkta Karmaşıklık ve Çelişki, Çev.: Serpil Merzi, Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı, 2005.
* David B. Brownlee, David G. Delong, Kathryn B. Hiesinger (Eds), Out of the Ordinary: Robert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown and Associates Architecture, Urbanism, Design, Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2001.
* Patrick Leslie West & Cher Coad (2020). "The CCTV Headquarters 'Horizontal Skyscraper or Vertical Courtyard' Anomalies of Beijing Architecture, Urbanism, and Globalisation". M/C Journal, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1680
* Caroline Iorio, "Anomalies Urbaines": Un Urbanisme d'Occupation à Hong Kong et Caracas. Enquête, Théorie et Méthode, EPFL, Ph Thesis, 2021 https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/288392/files/EPFL_TH7972.pdf ln=en
* Media Culture M/C Journal Vol. 23 No. 5 (2020): "anomaly" Özel Sayısı, https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/issue/view/anomaly

INTERNET SOURCES
* Güray Oskay, "Anomali Önleyici Olarak Mimarlık" 26 Tem 2017, Unlimited, https://www.unlimitedrag.com/post/anomali-onleyici-olarak-mimarlik
* Saul Kim, "Architecture Anomaly" https://www.saulkim.com/architecture-anomaly https://designwanted.com/architecture-anomaly-futuristic-ways-of-inhabiting/
* Build Blog, "5 Anomalies of Architecture" https://blog.buildllc.com/2010/10/5-anomalies-of-architecture/
* Kelly Ting, "Of Other Spaces: The Undocumented Anomalies of Hashima" https://www.soaparchive.ac.nz/2023/09/05/of-other-spaces-the-undocumented-anomalies-of-hashima/

DOCUMENTARIES
* Jennifer Baichwal, Edward Burtynsky, "Manufactured Landscapes", Belgesel, Kanada, 2006, 90dk.
* Jennifer Baichwal, Edward Burtynsky, Nicholas de Pencier "Anthropocene: The Human Epoch", Belgesel, Kanada, 2018, 87dk.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

1. The learning process develops through project/problem-based learning.
2. Students develop answers to the spatial problems/questions directed to them and progress by taking criticism.
3. The student's learning process is observed and recorded with the work done during the course, the criticisms given, the Concept jury, Midterm Jury and the Final Jury.

Assessment Methods

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

FCG =final project

Assessment Criteria

Final Project % 100 (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5)

Evaluation,
1) Being able to analyze and interpret the given context from multiple perspectives (Conceptual Analysis Studies);
2) Being able to investigate the architectural design problem in a versatile way (Programmatic Analysis);
3) To be able to develop and design a medium-complexity architectural program requirement and its spatial equivalents within the framework of a main idea with original and comprehensive solutions (Concept Jury);
4) To ensure the conceptual depth, clarity and continuity of the main idea throughout the process (Midterm Jury);
5) It will be done within the framework of the criteria of being able to express the project process in a qualified way in visual, written and verbal environments (Final Jury).

Research Assignment/Concept Jury (LO1, LO2): Consisting of Conceptual Analysis Studies and Programmatic Analysis, it includes the analysis of the urban context, the interpretation of a needs program to be developed from the context, and the study and in-class exercises that enable the development of a context-specific main idea.

Midterm Jury (LO1, LO2, LO3): It is a midterm exam that includes evaluating students' preliminary ideas about the field and program and their half-term development. A student who does not appear before the Midterm Jury without a documented excuse cannot submit a final submission.

Final Jury (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5): It is a final exam that includes an evaluation of the entire process of addressing the architectural design problem in a multifaceted manner and developing a research-based architectural design project.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

* Competency in concept development, site selection and architectural program creation related to the subject will be considered in the process of evaluation.
* Appearing in the Midterm Jury is mandatory and is a prerequisite for making the Final Submission.
* Receiving signature approval from min. 3 jury critiques to be taken during the semester by faculty members or staff is a prerequisite for Final Submission. Those who do not meet this requirement will not be able to make Final Submission.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

Prof. Dr. Deniz Güner / deniz.guner@deu.edu.tr
Prof. Dr. Ilknur Türkseven Doğrusoy / Ilknur.turkseven@deu.edu.tr
Prof. Dr. Ferhat Hacıalibeyoğlu / f.hacialibeyoglu@deu.edu.tr
Prof. Dr. Deniz Dokgöz / deniz.dokgoz@deu.edu.tr
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Feyzal Özkaban / feyzal.ozkaban@deu.edu.tr
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Halil Ibrahim Alpaslan / ibrahim.alpaslan@deu.edu.tr
Res. Assist. Rafet Utku / rafet.utku@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

To be announced.

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes