COURSE UNIT TITLE

: ANATOLIA IN THE CHALCOLITHIC AGE

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
ARK 2034 ANATOLIA IN THE CHALCOLITHIC AGE ELECTIVE 2 0 0 4

Offered By

Archeology

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR DOCTOR ENGIN AKDENIZ

Offered to

Archeology
Archeology (Evening)

Course Objective

The aim of this course is to give information about the Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia in terms of culture and settlements.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   To learn the basis of regions the Anatolian Cultures in the Early Chalcolithic, Middle Chalcolithic and Late Chalcolithic Period.
2   To learn about the elements of material culture produced by periods covered in this lesson.
3   To learn Anatolian Early Chalcolithic cultures the basis of regions.
4   To learn Anatolian cultures of Middle and Late Chalcolithic basis of regions.
5   Material culture items produced within the scope of the course is to learn about periods.

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Early Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Western Anatolia.
2 Early Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Middle Anatolia.
3 Early Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Southeastern and Eastern Anatolia.
4 Early Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Thracia.
5 Early Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Other regions.
6 General evaluation of the First Chalcolithic Age in Anatolia.
7 Mid-term examination.
8 Middle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Western Anatolia.
9 Midle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Middle Anatolia.
10 Midle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Thracia.
11 Middle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Other regions.
12 Middle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Other regions.
13 Middle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Other regions.
14 Middle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Other regions.
15 Middle and Late Chalcolithic Period in Anatolia, Other regions.
16 Final examination.

Recomended or Required Reading

1 Çilingiroğlu ve diğerleri 2004 Çilingiroğlu, A.-Derin, Z.-Abay, E.-Sağlamtimur, H.-Kayan, I., Ulucak Höyük, Excavations Conducted Between 1995 and 2002, Louvain-Paris-Dudley.
2 Duru, R., Kuruçay Höyük I, 1978-1988 Kazılarının Sonuçları, Neolitik ve Erken Kalkolitik Çağ Yerleşmeleri, Ankara.
3 Duru, R., From 8000 BC to 2000 BC Six Thousand Years of the Burdur - Antalya Region, Istanbul, 2008
4 Duru, R., Elli Yıllık Bir Arkeoloji Öyküsü. Hacılar, Antalya, 2010.
5 Efe,T., The Salvage Excavations at Orman Fidanlığı, A Chalcolithic Site in Inland Northwestern Anatolia, Istanbul, 2001.
6 Frangipane, M., Yakındoğu'da Devletin Doğuşu, Istanbul, 2002.
7 Harmankaya, S.-Tanındı, O.-Özbaşaran,M., Türkiye Arkeolojik Yerleşimleri 2, Neolitik, Istanbul, 1997.
8 Harmankaya, S.-Tanındı, O.-Özbaşaran,M., Türkiye Arkeolojik Yerleşimleri 3, Kalkolitik, Istanbul, 1998.
9 Hodder,I., Çatalhöyük, Leoparın Öyküsü, (Çev.D.Şendil), Istanbul, 2006.
10 Karul, N., Arkeoatlas. Tarihöncesinden Demir Çağı'na Anadolu'nun Arkeoloji Atlası, Istanbul, 2011.
11(Ed.Lichter, C.), International Workshop, May 20th-22nd 2004, How did farming reach Europe , Anatolian-European relations from the second half of the 7th through the first half of the 6th millennium cal BC., BYZAS 2, Istanbul.
12 (Ed. Özdoğan, M.-Başgelen, N.), Neolithic in Turkey: The Cradle of Civilization. New Discoveries, Istanbul, 1999.
13 (Ed. Özdoğan, M.-Başgelen, N.), Türkiye de Neolitik Dönem: Yeni Kazılar, Yeni Bulgular, Istanbul,2007.
14 Öztan, A., Köşk Höyük, Anadolu Arkeolojisi ne Yeni Katkılar , TÜBA-AR 5 (2002), 57-72.
15 Ed.Rodenberg, J.J.-Thissen, L.C.), The Ilıpınar Excavations II, Leiden, 2001.
16Umurtak, G., Neolitik Çağda Burdur Bölgesi ile Ege Adaları ve Yunan Karası Arasında Çanak Çömlek Biçimlerine Dayalı Benzerlikler Konusunda Bazı Gözlemler , Anadolu Araştırmaları XV (1999), 27-71.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

1-Formal Education
2-Presentation
3-Talk
4-Slide Shows
5-Museum Work

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 MTE MIDTERM EXAM
2 FIN FINAL EXAM
3 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE (RESIT) MTE * 0.40 + FIN * 0.60
4 RST RESIT
5 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE (RESIT) MTE * 0.40 + RST * 0.60


*** Resit Exam is Not Administered in Institutions Where Resit is not Applicable.

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

1 LO 1-4: Search assessed by the examination questions will be asked.
2 LO 1-7: Questions for the Final Examination will be evaluated.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

1 70% of the courses participation is mandatory.
2 To participate in the activities of the midterm and final, will be considered in the evaluation.
Presentation of the course, the students form the desired skills and bibliographies disclosure

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

engin.akdeniz@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

Tuesday 14.00-15.00

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 12 2 24
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 12 6 72
Preparation for midterm exam 1 4 4
Preparation for final exam 1 8 8
Midterm 1 1,5 2
Midterm 1 1,5 2
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 112

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14PO.15
LO.1555555555444555
LO.2555555555444555
LO.3555555555444555
LO.4555555555444555
LO.5555555555444555