COURSE UNIT TITLE

: CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
MBA 5106 CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT ELECTIVE 3 0 0 6

Offered By

Business Administration (English)

Level of Course Unit

Second Cycle Programmes (Master's Degree)

Course Coordinator

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR ENGIN BAĞIŞ ÖZTÜRK

Offered to

Business Administration (English)

Course Objective

This course aims to provide students an understanding of current indigenous management practices and to familiarize them with typical cultural values and style on managerial issues. This course provides students with knowledge of different cultures and acquaints students with skills to comprehend cross-cultural differences and their implications, organizational and managerial practices.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   Gain an understanding of basic structures, perspectives and consequences of culture.
2   Recognize cross-cultural dimensions and issues of different countries.
3   Comprehend the relationship between culture and management..
4   Sensitize intra and inter-cultural management issues from different multi-disciplines.
5   Develop oral/written communication skills; articulate and defend his/her position.
6   Develop and enhance the essential interpersonal skills to be an effective team member.

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Introduction to Cross Cultural Management
2 Culture
3 Relationship between Culture and Management
4 Cross Cultural Theories: Hofstede
5 Cross Cultural Theories: Hofstede
6 Cross Cultural Theories: Trompenaars
7 Türkiye
8 English Speaking Countries
9 Europe - East and West & Nordic Countries
10 Russia, the Baltic States and Central Asia
11 Current Debates in the Field
12 Term Project Presentations
13 Term Project Presentations
14 Review

Recomended or Required Reading

Hall, E.T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding Cultural Differences. Intercultural Press: Yarmouth.
Garrison, T. (1994). Managing People Across Europe. Butterworth Heinemann: Great Britain.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Lewis, Richard D. (2009). When cultures collide: managing successfully across cultures. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

1. Lecture
2. Presentation
3. Term Paper

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 PRJ PROJECT
2 PRS PRESENTATION
3 ASG ASSIGNMENT
4 FCG FINAL COURSE GRADE PRJ * 0.40 + PRS * 0.10 + ASG * 0.50


Further Notes About Assessment Methods

Explanations related to the assessment methods:

In general there are several assignments throughout the course: such as short case analysis, article assessments, book reviews, and interviews. Each assignment will consist of two parts: content and presentation, and will be evaluated with its own unique features. Given that each assignment has different content and presentation expectations, they will be announced in class.

Assignments will be evaluated with a scale ranging from 1-5: weak, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Weak (0-39%): Does not meet expectations due to missing content, plagiarism, or lack of effort. Fair (40-59%): Meets some expectations but needs
improvement in content, presentation, or originality. Good (60-79%): Meets all expectations with a satisfactory level of knowledge and presentation. Very Good (80-89%): Demonstrates strong understanding and critical thinking, exceeding most expectations.Excellent (90-100%): Exceeds all expectations in all areas.

Term Project:
The term project is about critical examination of a cross-cultural case/situation/symbol. The project will consist of three parts: content, presentation, and creativity. Each part within the project will be evaluated with its own unique features. Given that each part has different content and presentation expectations, they will be announced in class. Term projects will be evaluated with a scale ranging from 1-5: weak, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Weak (0-39%): Does not meet expectations due to missing content, plagiarism, or lack of effort. Fair (40-59%): Meets some expectations but needs improvement in content, presentation, or originality. Good (60-79%): Meets all expectations with a satisfactory level of knowledge and presentation. Very Good (80-89%): Demonstrates strong understanding and critical thinking, exceeding most expectations. Excellent (90-100%): Exceeds all expectations in all areas.

Presentation:
This refers to the presentation of the term project. It will be evaluated based on professionalism, communication, and impact. Presentations will be evaluated with a scale ranging from 1-5: weak, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Weak (0-39%):
Unorganized, unprofessional formatting, unclear writing, ineffective delivery. Fair (40-59%): Disorganized, unprofessional formatting, unclear writing, distracting delivery. Good (60-79%): Organized, appropriate formatting, clear writing, acceptable
delivery. Very Good (80-89%): Well-organized, professional formatting, clear writing, confident delivery. Excellent (90-100%): Flawless organization, professional formatting, clear and concise writing, engaging delivery.

Assessment Criteria

1. The learner will illustrate the basic structures, perspectives and consequences of culture.
2. Recognize cross-cultural dimensions and issues of different countries.
3. Comprehend the relationship between culture and management.
4. Sensitize intra and inter-cultural management issues from different multi-disciplines.

Language of Instruction

English

Course Policies and Rules

Academic integrity is to demonstrate responsbile and honest behaviors and follow ethical principles in academia. All students should respect the intellectual property rights of others. Specifically every student should avoid plagiarism. All types of
plagiarism are serious and violate academic integrity policy.
To understand and prevent plagiarism, please see the following link: https://www.plagiarism.org/understanding-plagiarism. During our lectures, a variety of information will be provided but if you have any problems you can ask me.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

Associate Professor Engin Bağış Öztürk, engin.ozturk[at]deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

As a general rule, please send an e-mail before stopping by the office. (Room No: 131/A)
Office hours will be announced in class by the instructor.

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 14 3 42
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 14 3 42
Preparation for midterm exam 0 15 0
Preparation for final exam 0 15 0
Preparing presentations 1 24 24
Project Preparation 1 35 35
Midterm 0 2 0
Final 0 2 0
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 143

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6
LO.15
LO.25
LO.34
LO.445
LO.555
LO.64