COURSE UNIT TITLE

: PROJECT REALIZATION III

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
RSM 3013 PROJECT REALIZATION III COMPULSORY 2 2 0 4

Offered By

Department of Painting

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR SAIT TOPRAK

Offered to

Painting
Department of Painting

Course Objective

The aim of the course is to get each student to experience the practice of creation of art; by making suggestions for project themes in order to aid the interpretation and individualization processes of the students, with discussions about the technique, form and context of the works produced.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   A project presentation; thereafter a presentation and discussion of the ideas that come up, in the form of visual notes.
2   To encourage the students to experiment with tools such as photography, videos and performances in addition to painting --when appropriate.
3   To discuss typical samples in order to benefit from various disciplines, and to aid the theoretical understanding of the subject with help of reading materials.
4   The works produced will be evaluated in the context of their references to art history.
5   The subject will be theoretically reinforced with the aid of reading materials.
6   In addition to the paintings, students will be experiencing the techniques like video and the phpotograph as a branch of the performative arts
7   To examine various typical examples, and analyze them for gaining the ability of writing and discuss on that area

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

RSM 2014 - Project Realization II
RSM 2013 - Project Realization I

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Presentation of the project and lecturing.
2 Visual presentation of samples of works from various disciplines.
3 Suggestions for theoretical texts and movies / videos.
4 Mutual conversation with students; discussion on the ideas they produce and suggestions about them.
5 Mutual conversation with students; discussion on the ideas they produce and suggestions about them.
6 Evaluation of visual notes and documents prepared by the students such as drawings, collages, photographs, texts and found images with regard to their aid in the creation process.
7 Evaluation of visual notes and documents prepared by the students such as drawings, collages, photographs, texts and found images with regard to their aid in the creation process.
8 Evaluation of visual notes and documents prepared by the students such as drawings, collages, photographs, texts and found images with regard to their aid in the creation process.
9 Evaluation of whether consistent progress is shown with regard to quality and quantity during the application process of the works.
10 Evaluation of whether consistent progress is shown with regard to quality and quantity during the application process of the works.
11 Evaluation of whether consistent progress is shown with regard to quality and quantity during the application process of the works.
12 Evaluation of whether consistent progress is shown with regard to quality and quantity during the application process of the works.
13 Evaluation of whether consistent progress is shown with regard to quality and quantity during the application process of the works.
14 Presentation and exhibition
15 Evaluation

Recomended or Required Reading

1. Arnheim, Rudolph, Görsel Düşünme, Metis Yayınları, Istanbul, Nisan 2009
2. Bourriaud, Nicolas, Postprodüksiyon, Bağlam yayınları Theoria Dizisi, Nisan 2004
3. Bourriaud, Nicolas, Ilişkisel Estetik, Bağlam yayınları Theoria Dizisi, Nisan 2005
4. Danto, C. Arthur, Sanatın Sonundan Sonra / Çağdaş Sanat ve Tarihin Sınır Çizgisi, Ayrıntı yayınları Sanat ve Kuram dizisi, Mayıs, 2010
5. Defining Contemporary Art-25 Years in 200 Pivotal Artworks, Phaidon Press , New York, 2002

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

To start a sustainable dialog with the students through mutual conversations about their "works", and identifying the references to contemporary art by making reading / watching suggestions in parallel to the works produced.

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 COM COMMITTEE
2 FCG FINAL COURSE GRADE COM * 1


Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

Mastery of technique used in the works, the skill in transforming the materials, consistency in the relationship between form and meaning, and richness of imagination. Presentation and exhibition techniques.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

The students must attend the classes for a duration set by the regulations.

If a student has his own suggestions for creative projects, these suggestions are evaluated and the student could be allowed to work on a project that is diferent from what's been assigned to the other students.

The scope of the project and the size and the number of works to be created are flexible; individual adaptations are possible.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)


Doç. Sait Toprak
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi
Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, DEÜ Tınaztepe Yerleşkesi
Adatepe Mah. Doğuş Cad. No:209
35390 Buca Izmir

s.toprak@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

Monday 12.00-13.00

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 14 2 28
Studio Works 14 2 28
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 14 1 14
Preparing assignments 2 6 12
Design Project 2 5 10
Preparing presentations 2 6 12
Evaluation 1 4 4
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 108

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14
LO.1153
LO.2315
LO.3513
LO.4531
LO.5531
LO.635553
LO.753