COURSE UNIT TITLE

Offered By

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR DOCTOR PINAR EVRIM MANDACI

Offered to

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Course Objective

The aim of the course is to give the students a thorough understanding of capital market institutions, entities and
instruments.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

FIN 2001 - FINANCIAL SYSTEM AND ENVIRONMENT

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Recomended or Required Reading

Frank Fabozzi, Franco Modigliani, Frank J. Jones, Foundations of Financial Markets and Institutions, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall 2014.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

1. Lectures
2. Presentations

Assessment Methods

Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

1. The learner will define the types of financial markets, institutions and instruments.
2. The learner will clearly define the functions of Borsa Istanbul (markets, instruments, orders, indices
and etc).
3. The learner will clearly distinguish between depository and non-depository institutions.
4. The learner will clearly define market efficiency, emerging markets, global diversification, market integration,
manipulation and insider trading.
5. The learner will define the characteristics and activities of brokerage firms, mutual funds, and investment
trusts.
6. The learner will differentiate between equity, debt (fixed-income) instruments and other financial instruments
such as asset-backed securities and financial derivatives.

Presentation assessment criterion 1
Clarification of the investment strategy (Justification of the chosen strategy with reference to relevant theories, concepts, and empirical evidence.) (30 points)

Presentation assessment criterion 2
Explanation of portfolio allocation strategy based on technical and fundamental analysis (diversification across different financial assets including stocks, debt securities, mutual funds, financial derivatives, and precious metals etc.) (30 points)

Presentation assessment criterion 3
Evaluating the performance of each financial asset and portfolio using key metrics (such as return, risk-adjusted return, and volatility (20 points)

Presentation assessment criterion 4
Clarity of content, engagement with the audience, effective use of presentation tools and adherence to time limits. Clarity of writing style, organization, and structure of the portfolio report. (20 points)

Assignment assessment criterion 1
Accurate explanation of the research topic including related concepts and terms. (15 points)
Assignment assessment criterion 2
Conducting a detailed literature review, demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of relevant theories, concepts, and empirical studies. Presenting an analysis and synthesis of existing literature to contextualize the topic. (20 points)
Assignment assessment criterion 3
Development of a conceptual framework that underpins the term paper. Clear explanation of key concepts and their interrelationships within the context of capital markets. (20 points)
Assignment assessment criterion 4
Demonstration of critical thinking skills through the evaluation of different perspectives, assumptions, and implications related to capital market concepts. (30 points)
Assignment assessment criterion 5
Clarity of writing style, organization, and structure of the term paper. Coherent flow of ideas, logical transitions between sections, and adherence to academic writing conventions. Accuracy and completeness of citations and references. (15 points)

The rating scale is as follows for each criterion:
This particular element is absent or falls short of expectations, and /or it is completely out of place within the given context. Poor (0%) This particular element is somewhat absent and does not entirely fit the context. Fair (40%) This particular element is developed satisfactorily and fits the context at an acceptable standard. Good (60%) This particular element is developed in a good and professional way and fits into the context. Very good (80%) The way this particular element is developed is noteworthy and fits perfectly into the context. Excellent (100%)

Language of Instruction

English

Course Policies and Rules

1. Attending at least 70 percent of the lectures is mandatory.
2. Violations of plagiarism of any kind will result in a disciplinary action.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

Office: 117
E-mail: pinar.evrim@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

By appointment

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes