COURSE UNIT TITLE

: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO V

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
MIM 4111 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO V COMPULSORY 4 4 0 9

Offered By

Architecture

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR DOCTOR TUTKU DIDEM ALTUN

Offered to

Architecture

Course Objective

It is aimed for students to understand and pose a design problem at an architectural scale within the framework of a hig-scale urban relations network, and to manage it on their own by including interdisciplinary studies in the process. It is aimed studetns will be able to develop a mixedfunction program by analyzing design problem and location-specific data and transform this program into spatial an formal designs. The project proposals expected to be developed are expected to focus on publicity , one of the important concepts discussed in the course, and to deal with multiple problems such as different users, mixed functions, upperscale urban decisions and their reflection on architectural design.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   Ability to analyze design problem within the framework of complex relationships from the land and its immediate surroungings to urban, regional end global scales
2   Ability to develop design ideas from a perspective that bears responsibility and a critical stance towards the city, environment and society
3   Ability to produce innovative creatice architectural solutions for a program that comprehends public practices and has large-scale and complex relationships
4   Ability to develop and present architectural solution suggestions in terms of spatial, structural and technical equipment
5   Ability to manage the project process autonomously by integrating interdisciplinary knowledge into the design process

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

MIM 3112 - ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO IV

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 General Introduction on the Scope, Content, Purpose and Method of the Course / Information about the subject and program / Panel: ''Urban Anomalies: Mutation-Adaptation / Exception-Possibility / Norm-New Order / Size: Giant-Dwarf / Abnormal Goods: Absence-Survival''
2 Concept Jury
3 Concept Jury
4 Concept Jury
5 Preliminary Project (1/500) - Jury Critique
6 Preliminary Project (1/500) - Jury Critique
7 Preliminary Project (1/500) - Jury Critique
8 Preliminary Project (1/500) - Jury Critique
9 Midterm Jury (1/500)
10 Detailed Project (1/200) - Jury Critique
11 Detailed Project (1/200) - Jury Critique
12 Detailed Project (1/200) - Jury Critique
13 Detailed Project (1/200) - Jury Critique
14 Detailed Project (1/200) - Jury Critique
15 Drawing Week / Presentation Techniques

Recomended or Required Reading

ESSENTIAL READINGS
* Rem Koolhaas; Bruce Mau, S, M, L, XL: Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large, The Monacelli Press, 1995.
* Rem Koolhaas, Francine Fort, Stefano Boeri, Sanford Kwinter, Daniela Fabricius, Nadia Tazi, Hans Ulrich Obrist, Mutations, ACTAR, 2000.
* Rem Koolhaas, Öğrencilerle Söyleşiler: Rem Koolhaas, Çev.: Nazım Dikbaş, YEM Yayın, 2014.
* Rem Koolhaas, Conversations with Students (Architecture at Rice), Princeton Architectural Press, 1996.
* Bernard Chang, Jeffrey Inaba, Rem Koolhaas, Sze Tsung Leong, Great Leap Forward / Harvard Design School Project on the City, Taschen, 2002.
* Rem Koolhaas; Hal Foster, Junkspace with Running Room, New York Review of Books, 2016.
* Kenneth Frampton, Megaform as Urban Landscape; Raoul Wallenberg Lecture, The University of Michigan, 1999.
* Junzo Kuroda, Momoyo Kaijima, Made in Tokyo: Guide Book, Kajima Institute Publishing Co., 2001.
* Robert Venturi, Steven Izenour, Denise Scott Brown, Learning from Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of Architectural Form [Revised Edition], The MIT Press, 1977.
* Robert Venturi, Las Vegas'ın Öğrettikleri: Mimari Biçimin Unutulan Simgeselliği, Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı, 1993.
* Robert Venturi, Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture [2nd ed.], Harry N. Abrams, 2002.
* Robert Venturi, Mimarlıkta Karmaşıklık ve Çelişki, Çev.: Serpil Merzi, Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı, 2005.
* David B. Brownlee, David G. Delong, Kathryn B. Hiesinger (Eds), Out of the Ordinary: Robert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown and Associates Architecture, Urbanism, Design, Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2001.
* Patrick Leslie West & Cher Coad (2020). "The CCTV Headquarters 'Horizontal Skyscraper or Vertical Courtyard' Anomalies of Beijing Architecture, Urbanism, and Globalisation". M/C Journal, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1680
* Caroline Iorio, "Anomalies Urbaines": Un Urbanisme d'Occupation à Hong Kong et Caracas. Enquête, Théorie et Méthode, EPFL, Ph Thesis, 2021 https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/288392/files/EPFL_TH7972.pdf ln=en
* Media Culture M/C Journal Vol. 23 No. 5 (2020): "anomaly" Özel Sayısı, https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/issue/view/anomaly

INTERNET SOURCES
* Güray Oskay, "Anomali Önleyici Olarak Mimarlık" 26 Tem 2017, Unlimited, https://www.unlimitedrag.com/post/anomali-onleyici-olarak-mimarlik
* Saul Kim, "Architecture Anomaly" https://www.saulkim.com/architecture-anomaly https://designwanted.com/architecture-anomaly-futuristic-ways-of-inhabiting/
* Build Blog, "5 Anomalies of Architecture" https://blog.buildllc.com/2010/10/5-anomalies-of-architecture/
* Kelly Ting, "Of Other Spaces: The Undocumented Anomalies of Hashima" https://www.soaparchive.ac.nz/2023/09/05/of-other-spaces-the-undocumented-anomalies-of-hashima/

DOCUMENTARIES
* Jennifer Baichwal, Edward Burtynsky, "Manufactured Landscapes", Belgesel, Kanada, 2006, 90dk.
* Jennifer Baichwal, Edward Burtynsky, Nicholas de Pencier "Anthropocene: The Human Epoch", Belgesel, Kanada, 2018, 87dk.


Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

The learning process develops through project/problem based learning
Students develop answers to spatial problems/questions directed to them and criticism proceeds by jury method
The student s work during the course and the improvements based on the criticism he/she receives are observed and recorded by the concept jury, midterm jury and final jury

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 COM COMMITTEE
2 FINAP PROJECT
3 FCG FINAL COURSE GRADE COM * 0.25 + FINAP * 0.75


Further Notes About Assessment Methods


FCG =final project

Assessment Criteria

Mid-term Jury: %25 (LO1, LO2, LO3)
Final jury: % 75 (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4)


Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

Project development process and criticisms are carried out in the Jury system. Each student must appear for the jury critique at least 3 times. The interim jury is excluded from this number. It is necessary to receive at least one jury critique from each of the Idea, 1/500 and 1/200 stages and to participate in the interim jury. Compliance with the policies and rules detailed in the officially announced term sheet is essential for passing the course.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

didem.akyol@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

To be announced.

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 12 4 48
Tutorials 12 4 48
Design Project 3 10 30
Project Preparation 3 12 36
Preparing presentations 3 7 21
Field study 2 6 12
Project Final Presentation 1 20 20
Project Assignment 1 12 12
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 227

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14PO.15
LO.13534
LO.2545
LO.354
LO.4553
LO.55