COURSE UNIT TITLE

: QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND ITS PHILOSOPHY

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
UKY 8047 QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND ITS PHILOSOPHY ELECTIVE 3 0 0 6

Offered By

Quality Management Non-thesis (Distance Learning)

Level of Course Unit

Second Cycle Programmes (Master's Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR DOCTOR AYSUN KAPUÇUGIL IKIZ

Offered to

Quality Management Non-thesis (Distance Learning)

Course Objective

This course aims to provide students with a holistic understanding of quality by exploring its philosophical foundations across historical, ethical, and sectoral dimensions.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   To analyze the philosophical foundations of quality and its evolution across historical contexts.
2   To evaluate different quality management models and their underpinnings.
3   To apply ethical reasoning in quality-related decision-making.
4   To develop sector-specific quality strategies.
5   To critically assess quality systems through independent research.

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Introduction and Course Overview Evolution of the concept quality, course objectives, expectations
2 Philosophical Approach to Quality What is quality Ontological and epistemological dimensions
3 Historical Development of Quality Management Transformation of quality understanding from the industrial revolution to the present
4 Quality Gurus Core principles, contributions, and comparative analysis of Deming, Juran, Crosby, and other gurus.
5 Total Quality Management (TQM) Philosophical foundations of TQM, implementation examples
6 Lean Thinking and Six Sigma Process improvement approaches and philosophical background
7 Quality and Leadership Leadership styles, building a quality culture
8 Quality and Organizational Culture Values, norms, and constructing a quality-oriented culture
9 Quality and Ethics Ethical decision-making, social responsibility, and quality
10 Digitalization and Quality Artificial intelligence, automation, and digital quality systems
11 Sustainability and Quality Quality in environmental, social, and governance dimensions
12 Sectoral Applications Quality philosophy in health, education, manufacturing, and service sectors
13 Critical Perspective: Alternative Approaches to Quality Postmodern critiques, counter perspectives on quality
14 Final Evaluation and Project Presentations Student presentations, discussions, course conclusion

Recomended or Required Reading

Deming's Out of the Crisis, Juran's Quality Handbook, and contemporary academic articles.

Toplam Kalite Yönetimi: Kuram, Ilkeler, Uygulamalar, Prof. Dr. Hasan Şimşek, 3. Baskı, Eylül 2018

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

* Lectures and in-class discussions: Lectures are geared towards conveying the topics and engaging in class discussions in an environment where understanding is significantly reinforced with additional explanations and examples.

* Assignments and Projects: Weekly reading analyses, case studies, and a final project proposal based on quality philosophy will be included.

* Resources: Supported by Deming - Out of the Crisis, Juran - Quality Handbook, and contemporary articles.

* Activities: Practical content such as guest speakers, industry representatives, or virtual/on-site factory tours will be provided.

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 MTE MIDTERM EXAM
2 STT TERM WORK (SEMESTER)
3 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE
4 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE (RESIT) MTE * 0.25 + STT * 0.35 + FCGR* 0.40
5 RST RESIT
6 FCGR FINAL COURSE GRADE (RESIT)


Further Notes About Assessment Methods

The midterm and final exams will consist of questions that will assess students' knowledge and reasoning skills on concepts and topics covered throughout the semester.

The term work includes weekly peer-reviewed publication readings, case analyses, and a final project proposal presentation addressing real-world quality issues.

Assessment Criteria

1. Midterm and Final Exams aim to evaluate students' understanding of key concepts and their ability to reason critically about quality-related topics covered throughout the semester.

Exams will be evaluated based on Conceptual knowledge (%30), Critical thinking and analytical reasoning (%40), Application through examples and case references (%20), Academic language and clarity of expression (%10)

2. Term Work Components: Individual peer-reviewed publication readings, Case analyses, Project proposal presentation addressing real-world quality issues

Each student must review and present at least one published article , and also analyze cases about the topics given by the instructor.

Each student must complete an final Proposal that allows them to apply their developed skills to a real-world qualiy issue. Project topics will be determined by the students and are subject to the approval of the instructor. This work will be evaluated for such factors as Depth of topic and literature mastery (%25), Critical evaluation and originality (%25), Structure, referencing, and academic integrity (%20), Presentation skills and visual support (%15), Time management and submission compliance (%15). The presentation should last a maximum of 15 minutes.

3. A good attendance record and participation may bring the grade up one level, for grades on the boundary between two grade levels. Participation will depend on (i) class attendance, (ii) the quality of answers the student provides to questions posed by the
instructor during class, and (iii) the general contribution the student makes to the creation of a positive learning environment.

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules

1. It is obligatory to attend at least 70% of the classes.

2. Violations of Plagiarism of any kind will result in disciplinary steps being taken.

3. Content generated solely by AI tools (Chat GPT, MS Copilot, etc.) should not be relied upon. Students should develop content primarily from their own reading and research. AI support is certainly welcome, provided it is used ethically. However, AI should be used as a supplementary resource, not as an author or co-author.

4. Absence will not be considered an excuse for submitting homework assignments late.

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

Prof. Dr. Aysun KAPUÇUGIL IKIZ
aysun.kapucugil@deu.edu.tr

DEU Faculty of Business
Department of Business Administration
Division of Quantitative Methods

Office Hours

To be announced the week classes begin.

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 14 3 42
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 12 3 36
Preparation for midterm exam 1 15 15
Preparation for final exam 1 15 15
Project Preparation 1 25 25
Preparing presentations 1 10 10
Final 1 2 2
Midterm 1 2 2
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 147

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6
LO.1444
LO.24444
LO.3444
LO.44444
LO.544