COURSE UNIT TITLE

: FIELD ELECTIVE VII (TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTED ARGUMENTATION APPLICATIONS)

Description of Individual Course Units

Course Unit Code Course Unit Title Type Of Course D U L ECTS
KIM 4209 FIELD ELECTIVE VII (TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTED ARGUMENTATION APPLICATIONS) ELECTIVE 2 0 0 4

Offered By

Chemistry Teacher Education

Level of Course Unit

First Cycle Programmes (Bachelor's Degree)

Course Coordinator

PROFESSOR DOCTOR GÜLTEN ŞENDUR

Offered to

Chemistry Teacher Education

Course Objective

The aim of this course is to provide pre-service chemistry teacher with argumentation skills with technology supported activities.

Learning Outcomes of the Course Unit

1   To be able to explain the basic approaches of argument and argumentation
2   To be able to explain the types of Web 2.0 tools.
3   To be able to evaluate argumentation applications in chemistry lessons
4   To be able to prepare the necessary environment for argumentation practices in chemistry lessons
5   Being able to design a technology-supported argumentation-based chemistry course

Mode of Delivery

Face -to- Face

Prerequisites and Co-requisites

None

Recomended Optional Programme Components

None

Course Contents

Week Subject Description
1 Argumentation and argumentation models
2 The role of Argumentation in the Chemistry Curriculum
3 Technologies Used in the Argumentation Process
4 Concept Cartoons and Argumentation: Canva, Tondoo
5 Digital Stories and Argumentation: Pixton, Storyjumper
6 Discussions and Argumentation: Edmodo, Whiteboard
7 Information Organization Systems and Argumentation-1: Padlet,Easly
8 Midterm exam
9 Information Organization Systems and Argumentation 2: Prezi, Powtoon
10 Prepare a lesson plan for argumentation
11 Students presentations-1
12 Students presentations-2
13 Students presentations-3
14 Students presentations-4
15 Students presentations-5
16 Final Exam

Recomended or Required Reading

Aktamış, H. (2017). Örnek etkinliklerle fen eğitiminde argümantasyon. Ankara, Türkiye: Anı Yayıncılık
Erduran, S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research.

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods

Discussion, research, presentation

Assessment Methods

SORTING NUMBER SHORT CODE LONG CODE FORMULA
1 MTE Midterm Exam
2 DTK Other Activity
3 FN Semester final exam
4 BNS BNS Student examVZ * 0.30 + Student examDTK * 0.10 + FN * 0.60
5 BUT Make- up note
6 BBN End of make-up grade Student examVZ * 0.30 +Student examDTK * 0.10 + BUT * 0.60


Further Notes About Assessment Methods

None

Assessment Criteria

Success in the midterm, final exams ans students' presentations determine the student's course success grade

Language of Instruction

Turkish

Course Policies and Rules


Attendance to at least 70% for the lectures is an essential requirement of this course and is the responsibility of the student. It is necessary that attendance to the lecture and homework delivery must be on time. Any unethical behavior that occurs either in presentations or in exams will be dealt with as outlined in school policy. You can find the undergraduate policy at https://bef.deu.edu.tr/tr/

Contact Details for the Lecturer(s)

e-mail: gulten.sendur@deu.edu.tr

Office Hours

It will be annocued during the semester

Work Placement(s)

None

Workload Calculation

Activities Number Time (hours) Total Work Load (hours)
Lectures 14 2 28
Preparations before/after weekly lectures 14 2 28
Preparation for midterm exam 1 5 5
Preparation for final exam 1 10 10
Preparing presentations 1 15 15
Midterm 1 2 2
Final 1 2 2
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) 90

Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes

PO/LOPO.1PO.2PO.3PO.4PO.5PO.6PO.7PO.8PO.9PO.10PO.11PO.12PO.13PO.14PO.15PO.16PO.17PO.18PO.19
LO.1
LO.2
LO.33334444
LO.43433455434
LO.534334553434